What does the mirror hour 22:22 mean?
SHOP SMOKING
OUR ONLINE SHOP HAS ARRIVED
DISCOVER OUR SWEATSHIRTS, T-SHIRTS WITH EXCLUSIVE DESIGNS AND MUCH MORE
If there’s one name that defines Halloween in horror cinema, it’s Michael Myers. That blank white mask, the heavy breathing, the slow, unstoppable walk ā this guy has haunted generations. Since his first appearance in 1978, Michael has become more than a slasher villain; heās a symbol of pure, silent terror.
But with over a dozen films, reboots, timelines, and even one movie that doesnāt feature him at all (yes, really), figuring out the right order to watch the Halloween saga can get messy. Whether you’re diving in for the first time or revisiting the madness, hereās the full list ā and a quick take on each ā to help you survive the night.
Contents
This is where it all began. Directed by John Carpenter, the original Halloween is a masterclass in minimalist horror. A young babysitter, a masked killer, and a haunting piano theme that still creeps under your skin. Itās not gory or flashy ā it builds dread slowly and effectively, proving that less really is more.
I still remember watching this for the first time, thinking āhow can something so quiet be this terrifying?ā Itās the kind of horror that doesnāt leave you shaken ā it settles in and lingers. A true classic that never feels outdated.
Picking up literally seconds after the first film ends, this sequel takes Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis) to a hospital ā where, of course, Michael follows. It ups the violence and leans more into the slasher style that the genre became known for in the ’80s.
I always recommend watching this one back-to-back with the original. It feels like the extended finale that Halloween (1978) didnāt have. Not quite as elegant, but still effective ā and definitely worth it if you want closure.
Plot twist: no Michael Myers. Yep, this is the black sheep of the franchise. Season of the Witch was meant to take the series in a new, anthology-style direction. Instead of masked killers, we get a bizarre tale about Halloween masks, witchcraft, and mind control through TV ads.
Honestly? Itās not a bad movie ā just a strange one to slap the Halloween name on. Once you accept it as its own weird thing, itās kind of fun. I revisited it years later and appreciated the camp and creepiness⦠but itās definitely an acquired taste.
After the backlash from Part III, the studio brought back the boogeyman ā and the title says it all. Michael is back, scarier than ever, this time going after his young niece, Jamie. It re-establishes the core slasher formula and introduces a new generation of victims.
What I love about this one is the atmosphere: Halloween night feels real, and Donald Pleasence as Dr. Loomis goes full intensity mode. Is it a little over-the-top? Absolutely. But itās also the return to form that fans were begging for. A solid comeback.
Picking up a year after Halloween 4, this sequel brings back Jamie (the niece) ā now traumatized, mute, and psychically connected to Michael. Yeah, it starts getting weird. The movie tries to blend supernatural elements with slasher tropes, and the result is… uneven.
Personally, this one felt like a step down. The tension from Part 4 is still there in moments, but the pacing is off and the characters donāt click the same way. Still, if you’re in it for the full Michael Myers experience, itās part of the ride. Just temper your expectations.
This is where things go full-on cult mode ā literally. The film introduces the āCult of Thorn,ā trying to explain Michaelās immortality through ancient curses and druidic rituals. Paul Rudd (yes, that Paul Rudd) plays an adult Tommy Doyle, the kid Laurie babysat in the original.
Itās messy, confusing, and notoriously tampered with in post-production (look up the Producerās Cut if you’re curious). As a fan, I wanted to like it more than I did. It has creepy visuals and some chilling moments, but the plot is so tangled itās hard to stay invested.
Now this is how you do a comeback. Jamie Lee Curtis returns as Laurie Strode, whoās changed her identity and is now a school headmistress ā but Michael finds her anyway. The movie ignores parts 4ā6 completely and acts as a direct sequel to Halloween II.
I have a soft spot for this one. Itās sleek, late-ā90s horror with a solid cast (Josh Hartnett, Michelle Williams), a killer soundtrack, and Curtis absolutely owning the final girl role again. If you like your Halloween horror a little more polished and nostalgic, this is a go-to.
This sequel⦠well, letās say itās divisive. It tries to modernize the franchise with a reality show concept: a group of young people spend the night in Michaelās childhood home, livestreamed online. Yes, itās very early-2000s. Also, Busta Rhymes fights Michael Myers.
Honestly? Itās kind of a disaster. The tone is all over the place, and Laurieās storyline gets a disappointing resolution early on. But weirdly, itās also entertaining in a “so bad itās fun” kind of way. If you’re watching with friends and a sense of humor, it works. Otherwise⦠maybe skip.
Director Rob Zombie rebooted the entire franchise with this gritty, blood-soaked remake. This version dives deep into Michaelās childhood, giving him a backstory that some fans love ā and others feel ruins the mystique. Itās brutal, loud, and very much a product of its time.
As someone who grew up with the original, I struggled with this at first. But on a rewatch, I saw what Zombie was going for: raw violence, psychological decay, and a more humanized monster. Itās not subtle, but it is intense. Definitely worth seeing if you want a more visceral take on the mythos.
Rob Zombieās follow-up to his 2007 remake is even more brutal and unfiltered. This sequel continues Laurieās story after surviving Michaelās attack ā but takes a darker, almost psychedelic turn. There’s more blood, more screaming, and Michael is now having visions involving a white horse and his dead mother.
Iāll be honest: this one is a tough watch. Itās raw and intense, but not in a satisfying way. It feels like a horror film that wants to break you down. Still, if you appreciate grungy, chaotic storytelling and donāt mind a totally unhinged take on Halloween, you might find value in it. Personally, I came out needing a break ā and maybe a hug.
Forty years after the original, Jamie Lee Curtis returns again as Laurie Strode ā this time as a hardened survivalist whoās been preparing for Michaelās return. This film ignores every sequel and sets itself as a direct continuation of Halloween (1978). Itās a fresh start⦠with a serious edge.
This reboot works. It brings back the minimalism and tension of the original, but with modern polish. Laurieās trauma is explored with depth, and the kills are nasty. Watching this in the cinema was electric ā the final act, in particular, feels like a long overdue payoff for fans. Easily one of the strongest entries in the saga.
If Halloween (2018) was about Laurieās revenge, Kills is about the townās collective trauma. Michael goes on an absolute rampage, the body count skyrockets, and the phrase āEvil dies tonight!ā gets repeated⦠a lot.
This oneās divisive. The kills are creative and savage, and it expands the scope of Haddonfieldās story. But it also stumbles in tone ā sometimes feeling chaotic and repetitive. I appreciated what it tried to say about mob mentality and fear, but it felt like a middle chapter that didnāt know where to land. Still, Michael is terrifying here ā maybe the most dangerous heās ever been.
And so, we end ā though not the way many expected. Halloween Ends swerves from the classic formula to focus on a new character, Corey, whose story gradually intersects with Michaelās. Laurieās back, yes, but in a more reflective, almost quiet role. Michael? Heās barely in the movie until the last act.
This finale is a huge departure. It takes risks, plays with new themes (trauma, legacy, influence), and some fans hated it. Personally, I admired the attempt to do something different ā but itās a strange note to finish the saga on. The final fight between Laurie and Michael does deliver, but getting there feels⦠odd. Watch it with an open mind.